You'll be graded on three basic criteria:

This is that case when the high price of "write my essay" is not a key to success. We choose to have more clients than to have so high prices that no one wants to work with us. But the best thing about this is that quality remains high, content is still original, and you get your paper on time. Business must be fair both for us and for you. Cooperating with clients is far better than just working for money!

But others raise arguments that are specifically related to women's rights:

The issue of abortion is one of the most commonly used as a topic for academic argumentative papers. Definitely, abortion is a very sensitive issue from the moral and ethical points of view, and there are numerous proponents and opponents of abortions in the US. Writing an academic paper on abortion can give the writer a great field for arguing and discussing numerous pros and cons of this controversial issue. At the same time, writing argumentative essay on abortion can help author formulate own point of view on this problem and demonstrate own opinion and position regarding abortion legalization.

Warning: this article includes strong sexual language.

Some argue that abortion does not liberate women, but allows society not to cater to women's needs.

I am simply interested in this paper in the moral arguments about abortionwithout regard to whether they might also support some particular Scripturalinterpretations or not. This paper will deal, not with unsubstantiatedand unargued, non-reasoned claims for ethical principles based on authority,but with evidence that is given either for abortions in certain cases oragainst them in others, evidence that is meant to be logical and also compassionateand understanding. Such a method is not infallible, but the mistakes itengenders are at least correctable by use of the method itself. Logic isalways open to other logical rebuttal; and compassion is always open tocompassion that encompasses more correct understanding. The nature of arational, intelligent, compassionate ethical discussion gives the hopethat if error of either sort is made, it can be discovered and correctedby further thought, understanding of experience, and discussion. Presentpolitical and judicial rhetoric and decisions do not give me that hope.I am also not given that hope by some seemingly entrenched, unreflective,and irrationally dogmatic religious views or by some of the equally unreflectiveand irrationally dogmatic supposedly "liberal" or "modern" views. Neitherthe total "pro-life" nor the total "pro-choice" side seems to me to havea monopoly on the right or even on being reasonable on this issue. In thispaper I also wish to point out the lack of merit, and sometimes even thetotal lack of relevance, of some of the more politically popular or well-publicizedarguments on both sides of the abortion issue. I think there are betterand more relevant considerations that can shed more light on the subject.

So, let’s look at the assumptions one by one and see how they fare.

But if this emendation isaccepted, the gap in the argument against abortion stares us plainly in theface: it is by no means enough to show that the fetus is a person, and toremind us that all persons have a right to life--we need to be shown also thatkilling the fetus violates its right to life, i.e., that abortion is unjustkilling. And is it?

Popular, But Pitifully Weak, Arguments

Abortion advocates often point to the lack of quality of life a givenfetus may encounter once born, and anti-abortionists often totally ignoreor discount as irrelevant the question of quality of life the fetus islikely to face once born. From both the facts that we rightfully do notseek total conception of every possible egg, nor the extermination of everyunhappy already-living human being, it seems that quality of life has somebearing on the value of the existence of life, but that it is not the onlyconsideration. I will return later to this issue.

I just wanted to say that you are the man.

There are also some people who seem to have a particularly inconsistentview -- those who hold that all conceived babies should be allowed to beborn regardless of their quality of life because life is a virtual absolutevalue, and who also hold that it is right to let people (let alone makeor draft people to) go to war in defense of something such as property,liberty, economic and/or social system, where defense of life is not atissue. One cannot consistently hold that life is the most important thingthere is and that it is all right for one to risk his life for somethingof less value. This inconsistency seems particularly odd since it seemsto put greater value on (potential) life that is not yet self-consciousthan it puts on life that is already self-conscious and may even have areasonably known particularly (deservedly) bright future.