Complex issues and detailed research call for complex and detailed essays. Argumentative essays discussing a number of research sources or empirical research will most certainly be longer than five paragraphs. Authors may have to discuss the context surrounding the topic, sources of information and their credibility, as well as a number of different opinions on the issue before concluding the essay. Many of these factors will be determined by the assignment.
Online discussions are vital toward reaching learning objectives. Think about ways to link the discussions and activities to specific outcomes so students “see” the connections.
IELTS Writing Task 2: sample discussion essay - Simon
I would like to focus your attention not on the subject of thearticle (national security in a nuclear world) but on the kind ofconclusion they reached, namely that there is no technicalsolution to the problem. An implicit and almost universalassumption of discussions published in professional andsemipopular scientific journals is that the problem underdiscussion has a technical solution. A technical solution may bedefined as one that requires a change only in the techniques ofthe natural sciences, demanding little or nothing in the way ofchange in human values or ideas of morality.
(Model essay) Sample discussion essay response – …
Perhaps it is helpful to think of an essay in terms of a conversation or debate with a classmate. If I were to discuss the cause of World War II and its current effect on those who lived through the tumultuous time, there would be a beginning, middle, and end to the conversation. In fact, if I were to end the argument in the middle of my second point, questions would arise concerning the current effects on those who lived through the conflict. Therefore, the argumentative essay must be complete, and logically so, leaving no doubt as to its intent or argument.
Free IELTS resources to help you maximize your score
It is at this point of the essay that students may begin to struggle. This is the portion of the essay that will leave the most immediate impression on the mind of the reader. Therefore, it must be effective and logical. Do not introduce any new information into the conclusion; rather, synthesize the information presented in the body of the essay. Restate why the topic is important, review the main points, and review your thesis. You may also want to include a short discussion of more research that should be completed in light of your work.
Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not - Wikipedia
The argumentative essay requires well-researched, accurate, detailed, and current information to support the thesis statement and consider other points of view. Some factual, logical, statistical, or anecdotal evidence should support the thesis. However, students must consider multiple points of view when collecting evidence. As noted in the paragraph above, a successful and well-rounded argumentative essay will also discuss opinions not aligning with the thesis. It is unethical to exclude evidence that may not support the thesis. It is not the student’s job to point out how other positions are wrong outright, but rather to explain how other positions may not be well informed or up to date on the topic.
Wikipedia is not a dictionary, or a usage or jargon guide
In our day (though not in earlier times) technical solutionsare always welcome. Because of previous failures in prophecy, ittakes courage to assert that a desired technical solution is notpossible. Wiesner and York exhibited this courage; publishing ina science journal, they insisted that the solution to the problemwas not to be found in the natural sciences. They cautiouslyqualified their statement with the phrase, "It is ourconsidered professional judgment...." Whether they wereright or not is not the concern of the present article. Rather,the concern here is with the important concept of a class ofhuman problems which can be called "no technical solutionproblems," and more specifically, with the identificationand discussion of one of these.